Adding a unique identifier to the comment during a bulk-update is great. In fact, bulk updates are so powerful and (from time to time) have unintended side effects (e.g. accidentally leaving 4 identical comments on each bug :P), that I'd suggest that we make it common practice to add such an ID.
Some notes: 1) The date in the ID To avoid confusion (because date syntax can differ between europe and the us), I'd suggest that we use the unambiguous YYYY-MM-DD for the syntax, e.g. 2015-01-10 2) I can imagine that we might want to issue 2 different bulk updates in a single day, so I'd suggest something like: "NEEDINFO notification: 2015-01-10" "NEEDINFO -> INVALID: 2015-01-10" Having the unique ID means that we can get a list of all bugs in a given bulk-update with a simple Bugzilla string search. Best, --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
