On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/23/2015 12:32 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: >>> So the time has finally arrived that we are moving forward with _locking >>> out priority/severity_. This means that *MAB will be retired*. >> I'd like to suggest to add this query as a reocurring item for the Robinson >> and >> the rest of the call to look at during the QA section of the ESC call: >> >> >> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=PLEASETEST&chfield=priority&chfieldfrom=-8d&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=highest&list_id=545001&priority=highest&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&resolution=--- >> >> It shows: >> >> - open bugs >> - that were changed to priority highest (thus a MAB) in the last 8 days >> (aka ~since the last call) >> - and currently are still priority highest (and thus a MAB) >> >> This is for the ESC to both be aware of newly marked important bugs -- and >> also >> to weed out one or another wrongly marked high priority bug. Also, this >> should >> help us keep the total number of high priority bugs both under control and on >> the radar. >> >> @Robinson: Can you take that up?
Sure, I'll take a look at that. > Along with this - I created the patch months ago that is sitting in the > test instance to block priority/severity from being changed by > "non-contributors." Beluga and I put in some time adding all devs and QA > members (or at least the vast majority) to a new group in bugzilla so > that they will have the rights without requesting. At this point I'm > just waiting for Robinson to give me some feedback as to what the hold > up is. I'm happy to deploy the changes to production asap -- perhaps tomorrow after the ESC call would work well. I just want to make sure that I have some QA folks available to hammer on the changes and make sure nothing wonky has happened. I don't think that we'll see any interference between the patches and the git-integration for the devs, but that'll be another piece to double-check. Cheers, --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org 802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/