HI *, On Sunday, November 29, 2015, Tommy <ba...@quipo.it> wrote:
> Joel Madero wrote: > >> Hi Tommy, >> >> 1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too >>> much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3 >>> months after the EOL >>> >> >> I still disagree :) I don't see that many benefits and I see potential >> issues that cause headaches for users and contributors alike. >> > > let's do practical examples... > I'm not seeing many bug reports about RCs of old .1, .2, .3 ... .6 > releases after 4 months that the final .7 RC1 has been released > As long as the comment moving all to the maj.min version includes the original version (or even adds it as a whiteboard item, I don't see need for having the versions available. But of course knowing the "exact" (in quotes, as not necessarily really oldest version, but at least you know that relase suffered from it) version without digging through history is nice... ciao Christian
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
