Hi, On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 07:40:20AM -0700, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > In the same way, we got keywords "want-backtrace" and "have-backtrace" in > Bugzilla, it could be useful to have "want-valgrind" and "have-valgrind". > The goal is to re > Moreover, we already have a link how to do it (even if for the moment, it's > only for Linux) > :https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugReport/Debug_Information#GNU.2FLinux:_How_to_get_a_Valgrind_log. > > Any thoughts?
I think this is both too specific and too generic. On one side, valgrind is only one of available memory debuggers: there is also ASAN (granted, it requires a specific setup) or DrMemory on Windows. On the other side, memory checker is only one of the valgrind tools (albeit the default one). Maybe "want-memtrace" or "want-memcheck"? (I prefer the latter.) D. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
