Hey Sophie, Sophie wrote on 29-02-16 18:27: > But bug hunting sessions are dedicated to new features and testing them > thoroughly before the releases, so what you propose is something
Sure. It's no one else but us, though, that determine the purpose of BHS. So if we learn that a certain approach is not appealing any more (or not at the moment), why not change? As BHS' currently do not work for new release testing, it would be a pity not to use them for another hard needed subject. > .... so what you propose is something > different, but could be implemented under another name like "code > squeezing sessions" Another event could possibly put extra pressure on people's agenda. Not sure if that will be met with applause :) But.. it's my feeling and my opinion. If there is strong evidence of support for something else: fine for me :) Cheers, Cor -- Cor Nouws GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28 A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6 - vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org - volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org - The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/