El 20/09/16 a les 10:30, Jan Iversen ha escrit:
“proposedEasyHack” was confusing at the time whitewords were used as the
search engine didn't work well with ie. 'proposedEasyHack' and
'easyhack'. However, now we use keywords and it works differently as the
number of keywords is fixed and it searches for the entire word.
Curiously, this keyword’s first name was “proposedEasyHack”, which at
some point was found “confusing” by someone. I just find it a bit
funny that a similar name is being proposed now… ;-)
I too found needsEasyhackEvaluation a bit curious.
But I have to admit that the current use:
keyword=easyhack and status=NEEDINFO
is not the best way to do it.
So adding a keyword seemed as a sensible option, I preferred just to
keep keyword=needsDevEval, since that can be used independent of easy
hack, but I leave that decision to the QA team.
The point of changing the word to 'needsEasyHackValidation' is to limit
its use to only easyhacks. 'needsDevEval' is too general and could be
use in order cases where we don't want contributors to use it.
Same here. According to the wiki, 'needAdvice' is meant to used for
unconfirmed bugs which need help from a developer in order to get
confirmed. Thus, using 'needsConfirmationAdvice' we limit its use to
just that, avoiding contributors to use it somewhere else.
the renaming of keyword=needAdvice to keyword=needsConfirmationAdvice
is a bit strange to me. If a bug is not confirmed, it has
status=UNCONFIRMED, so I am unsure why we keep
We should be careful not to have too many keywords, and especially not
to make workflows into changing keywords.
Libreoffice QA Team
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreofficeemail@example.com
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/