Hi Bjorn,
El 04/10/16 a les 15:14, Bjoern Michaelsen ha escrit:
Those repos could help to easily identify the problematic commit in these bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&f1=keywords&f2=keywords&f3=keywords&f4=keywords&f5=keywords&list_id=638789&o1=allwords&o2=nowords&op_sys=All&op_sys=Linux%20%28All%29&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&v1=regression&v2=preBibibect%20notBibisectable%20bisected&version=4.0.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.0.0.0.alpha1&version=4.0.0.0.beta1&version=4.0.0.0.beta2&version=4.0.0.0%20beta1&version=4.0.0.1%20rc&version=4.0.0.2%20rc&version=4.0.0.3%20release&version=4.0.1.1%20rc&version=4.0.1.2%20release&version=4.0.2.1%20rc&version=4.0.2.2%20release&version=4.0.3.1%20rc&version=4.0.3.2%20rc&version=4.0.3.3%20release&version=4.0.4.1%20rc&version=4.0.4.2%20release&version=4.0.5.1%20rc&version=4.0.5.2%20release&version=4.0.6.1%20rc&version=4.0.6.2%20release&version=4.0%20all%20versions&version=4.1.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.1.0.0.alpha1&version=4.1.0.0.beta1&version=4.1.0.0.beta2&version=4.1.0.1%20rc&version=4.1.0.2%20rc&version=4.1.0.3%20rc&version=4.1.0.4%20release&version=4.1.1.1%20rc&version=4.1.1.2%20release&version=4.1.2.1%20rc&version=4.1.2.2%20rc&version=4.1.2.3%20release&version=4.1.3.1%20rc&version=4.1.3.2%20release&version=4.1.4.1%20rc&version=4.1.4.2%20release&version=4.1.5.1%20rc&version=4.1.5.2%20rc&version=4.1.5.3%20release&version=4.1.6.1%20rc&version=4.1.6.2%20release&version=4.1%20all%20versions&version=4.2.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.2.0.0.alpha1&version=4.2.0.0.beta1&version=4.2.0.0.beta2&version=4.2.0.1%20rc&version=4.2.0.2%20rc&version=4.2.0.3%20rc&version=4.2.0.4%20release&version=4.2.1.1%20release&version=4.2.2.1%20release&version=4.2.3.1%20rc&version=4.2.3.2%20rc&version=4.2.3.3%20release&version=4.2.4.1%20rc&version=4.2.4.2%20release&version=4.2.5.1%20rc&version=4.2.5.2%20release&version=4.2.6.1%20rc&version=4.2.6.2%20release&version=4.2.6.3%20release&version=4.2.7.1%20rc&version=4.2.7.2%20release&version=4.2.8.1%20rc&version=4.2.8.2%20release&version=4.2%20all%20versionsHi, On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Xisco Fauli wrote:Does anybody know anything about 41max and 42max bibisect repositories mentioned in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLmEfvjVN7s&t=07m39s ? I can't find them anywhere but it would be wonderful to have those too.They have been removed on the rationale that someone looking for an bug as old as between 4.0 and 4.1 or 4.1 and 4.2 is rather rare and if it happens -- they should just download the 43all repo.
I'm afraid that's not right. I've just bibisected tdf#102205 with 43all and the regression was introduced in https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=f2321c529adf6d4a455742c30fb75fbe3f7efe02..911186d98f06b43d4563b401244e2cc216b76f33 which clearly shows it's not a max repoFWIW, 43all contains the builds from 41max and 42max (and then some) -- so when server admins complained about use of disc space, the latter where deleted as the former can do everything they can.
Regards -- Xisco Faulí Libreoffice QA Team IRC: x1sc0 _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
