https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87537
Adolfo Jayme <f...@libreoffice.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Adolfo Jayme <f...@libreoffice.org> --- (In reply to Jay Philips from comment #2) > > 2) it just doesn’t make sense to have inactive widgets in UI. Let me quote > > bug 86050 comment 1: “… it would be very sophisticated if the scrollbar > > would not be there at the beginning if there is nothing to scroll…” > > Yes that makes sense in a text field where the contents of the field are > modified by the user, but this scenario is different. No. It is not a different scenario at all. It is the very same thing, an UI managing content overflow. A scrollbar is needed when content overflows its container, when it doesn’t, then don’t add a scrollbar. > The wider boxes is an effect of having or not having the scrollbars, so > always having the scrollbars is the correct fix, IMHO. You did not seem to understand my point, at all. Why should you “fix” a UI element by introducing another bug (i.e., forcing a scrollbar to appear when it’s not needed)?????????? It’s simply beyond me, and I don’t want anybody to do that. It’s simply the wrong way to do it. You have an issue with a box, you fix the box itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise