https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112852
--- Comment #8 from Yousuf Philips (jay) <philip...@hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Octavio Alvarez from comment #6) > Then I chose option (a) ;-) Out of kidding, option (a) is not a bad option > either and I am open to it if it makes it easier to understand. It's a sign > that it may be easier for other users too. Option (b) is the only correct option in my view. I tried the same example in MS Word and the result was quite strange as step 5 resulted in 'LibreOffice' being bold and the other text being not bold, and step 6 resulted in all the text being bold and no longer looking like step 4. > My suggestion is [so far] strictly about *the application / un-application > of default formatting* because it clearly breaks the user expectation as > currently implemented. It has [so far] nothing to do with changing styles. > Changing a style is just the easiest way to expose the broken behavior. > Another way is through the paintbrush as DF plays a role on how it works: Please provide an example that is only DF, if it has nothing to do with styles, and not using paintbrush, as that opens up a different set of problems. > 6. Place cursor between "a" and "i" in "Plain". Hit Paintbrush. Hit the "a" > in "Heading". Nothing happens at all. this would be a bug in paintbrush in my view. > 7. Place the cursor between "r" and "c" in "ForcedRegular". Hit Paintbrush. > Hit the "a" in "Heading". The word "Heading" turns regular. I hit the "a" and only the "a" turned regular, so i'm assuming you clicked on the entire word. > When applying Direct Formatting, attributes that end up matching the > underlying styles [1] should be unset. I could agree with you and Heiko on this behaviour. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise