https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115981
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |needsUXEval
CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
| |.freedesktop.org
Summary|SIDEBAR: Panel's minimum |SIDEBAR: Panel's minimum
|width can be circumvented |width can be circumvented
|making the panel unusable. |hiding controls on the
| |panel
--- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> ---
Yes, as I've been saying. I have little trouble that a deck or content panels
can shrink/open at less that its minimum width (i.e. a sum of widths of widgets
and labels) and have widgets hidden. That is a helpful feature of the Sidebar,
which by the way is exactly the behavior of Toolbars.
What still needs to be implemented for Sidebar is a button control on the Title
bar of each Deck to snap that deck to its calculated minimum, while allowing
the _all_ decks to expand/contract (and holding that width while switching Deck
to Deck) to a users preferred width while working on a document, and make the
GUI consistent.
As implemented Gallery, Styles, Transitions, Animations, Decks/Content Panels
are correct! They each resize fully until collapse.
A number other decks modified with enforced minimums--e.g. Properties, Page,
Navigator (in Writer)--have all been _broken_ during implementation as they can
not be reduced in width to collapse. They are inconsistent and break the UI/UX.
To move this forward, suggest we:
1) set a dynamic minimum (widgets + labeling width--localized) for each deck
2) provide a button control on the Deck Title bar to snap to that width
3) restore the drag width to collapse for all decks to make the UI consistent
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
