https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127892
--- Comment #5 from Pedro <vermelhusco1...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 155526 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=155526&action=edit Calc 6.3 (left) versus Calc 6.2 (right) 1920*1080 I am against offering an option to use the old design of the sheet tab. It's a waste of developer time to offer such a thing for minor benefits for a minority of users that should have no problems to adjust their workflow slightly. The benefits to users with impaired vision should supersede these ones. Furthermore, the issues pointed out are minor at best. As you can see in my attachments of Calc 6.3 versus Calc 6.2 at 1920*1080 and 1366*768 the differences to data visualization are minimal. Also the differences to number of tabs that are visible in both cases are minimal as well. At 1920*1080 I can still only see fully 47 rows. The 48th row was cut-off in 6.2 and is slightly more cut-off in 6.3 but still reachable if someone wants to select directly with the mouse. At 1366*768 I can only see 29 rows in Calc 6.2 and I can only see 29 rows in 6.3. There is no difference in data visualization with the old design and the new design. As for the number of visible sheet tabs: At 1920*1080, in 6.2 I could fully see 27 sheets in 6.2, and I can fully see 27 sheets in 6.3. The 28th sheet is still clickable in 6.3, so there's no forcing of having to use the arrows to navigate because there's loss of visualization of a sheet tab. At 1366*768, in 6.2 I can fully see 19 sheets and in 6.3 I can fully see 19 sheets. The 20th is not selectable in 6.3 but can still be picked in 6.2. These trade-offs were considered when coming up with the new design and were deemed acceptable considering the benefits for visually impaired users and to update the UI. I am against changing vertical and horizontal padding because I don't agree that the current design has severe impacts on anyone's workflow. I also could not find a difference in the default height of the formula bar as mentioned here. However, I do agree that a better visual separation between inactive sheet tabs should be considered. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
