https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139522
Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
CC| |vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
--- Comment #3 from Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> Don't see a clear use case in your description. Here a common workflow:
> Document A with some structured text and images, and you want to copy the
> image and paste in another document. The expectation is that the image is
> placed as in the source including position, size, anchor, style etc.
> Cleaning the image format attributes on paste makes not much sense to me.
Hmm.. disagree. In advance.. There is no totally satisfying solution. I can't
deny there likely cases where you're right. However the current behavior
doesn't make much sense to me on global scale
1. It creates a difference in behavior between external image source from
internal copy/paste (of image only)
2. Say I select the image.. and create a new document and paste it.. do I
want/need it at the 'old' spot.. No.
3. It does also not make sense in documents.. when moving an image.. see
example file..
But will I argument also extends to 'pasting' behavior to character' being
similar 'as character'. So mimicking it.. Would align with MSO (but that's
non-argument as such). But makes also sense you want to do that..
I also copy/paste & drag drop as 'same thing' except the one input being
mouse.. the other keyboard.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
