https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151133
Rafael Lima <rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Keywords| |needsUXEval
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Blocks| |145878
CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
| |.freedesktop.org
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #6 from Rafael Lima <rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #5)
> I put WontFix so far but if there's an argument why it would be better in
> LO, anyone feel free to comment, we still may set New if there's a need.
The use case reported by the OP is somewhat common. Often times we have a table
in Calc and then we need to delete some rows, but only their contents (not the
actual row). After deleting many rows, the user needs to compact the table by
removing the empty rows.
Another use case is when you copy and paste tables from HTML pages into Calc,
which sometimes results in some rows being empty and the user needs to compact
the data.
The use cases described above led me to develop the Remove Blanks extension.
I would be willing to try to integrate this extension into LO. Maybe we could
hear from the UX team if this is worth the effort.
Let's keep this as UNCONFIRMED and add the UX team in the loop. There's also a
meta bug 145878 about implementing features as extensions.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145878
[Bug 145878] [META] Enhancements that could be realized per extension
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
