https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006
--- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tie...@documentfoundation.org> --- Created attachment 189339 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189339&action=edit Dialog (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > * better sequencing of options? > > e.g., all "paragraph and table" spacing options together? > all the 1.1 options together? Sounds good to me (and has no consequences for the l10n team) > * maybe separate heading is unnecessary for "Form menu" if there is only > going to be one change like this. (see also bug 126375, comment 2) This one is a global option while all other are saved per document. There are a few more yet not exposed at the UI, see https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/officecfg/registry/schema/org/openoffice/Office/Compatibility.xcs?r=28675af8#168 > "Reorganize" is not a good word for the label. > Better label might be "Form dropdown menu like Microsoft". "Microsoft compatible Form menu" maybe. But I'd rather omit this option as a corner case and to clean up the dialog. > * general review of option labels for possible improvements/corrections > (e.g., bug 141676) As a rule of thumb we could start the entries with an action. Like "Add.." , "Use..." etc. "Word-compatible trailing blanks" could become "Use...". I don't like "Protect form (..." but ultimately all these options requires to study the help. And I'd keep the burden low for l10n. > * is the scroll box really needed? (i.e., general design/layout of dialog > can probably be simplified) Nothing bad with it on macOS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
