https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167567
--- Comment #14 from Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #13) > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #12) > > In comment 4 we see VCL: qt5, which is unusual as that backend should not be > > used in production, but if the issue is seen with kf5/kf6, then it doesn't > > matter. > > Well, we may not want for it to be used in production, but that's what we're > building our nightlies: > > https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@tb99- > TDF/current/ > > to offer. If I try to choose kf5/kf6, I just get gtk3 as a fallback. If we > were to build DEBs with kf5/kf6 support (or even gtk4 for that matter), I > could try that. Then something has gone wrong, maybe with the upgrade to AlmaLinux 9 in our infra. Bibisect repos certainly used to be built with kf5 (but not with kf6 and that was starting to become a problem). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
