Hi Niko,
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 02:41 +0300, Niko Rönkkö wrote:
> I think that it would be best to name all options consistently like:
I like the idea of consistent naming; though we need to make sure that
all the distro packagers at least get notified so they can change
their .spec files, and we get the distro-config/ parameter files sorted
out cleanly [ hopefully the bulk of their parameters are standardised
there ].
> I just don't know hot to make those changes elsewhere than in configure.
Sure - that is the place.
> There is also a lots of non documented options like --enable-epm.
Which need documenting :-)
> And then there is that:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/configure.in#n128
> Which is definedly wrong and which nobody knows how it should be...
:-)
> I'd like to make a patch to those if only I would know where those
> changes shall made in.
In configure.in - but can we separate the (more controversial)
re-ordering of all arguments with the fixing / documenting of the
options.
I guess we should also try to fix this in the 'inner' configure in
bootstrap/ since we hope to abandon the 'outer' configure for 3.3.next
> PS. There is also some OOo'isms like --with-ooo-builddir. Should be
> --with-builddir or something like that - I think.
:-) quite probably some renaming, and/or simple removal of obsolete &
unusued options is necessary too.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
