Michael Meeks wrote:
>       Does that mean we should use some of the boost system abstractions
> instead of our own home-brewed ones where appropriate - perhaps ;-) - is
> that what underlies the question ? clearly if they perform better it'd
> be lovely - is there some low-hanging fruit here ? I was wondering if we
> could inline & perhaps optimise out lots of atomic referencing
> operations around the place :-)
> 
Nah, this was prompted by the array-detection magic from Caolan, of
which I was reminded of a nice boost::type_traits helper using a
similar technique. No particular plans to replace anything - just a
bunch of useful helpers we could now use at places ...

-- Thorsten

Attachment: pgpD3X0nkqC9p.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to