On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 17:18 +0100, René Kjellerup wrote: > > Why the oracle copyright notice in the new file too? > Shouldn't they have a TDF notice instead ?
Yes, for new files, we should use the following header notice. /* * Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ * * The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version * 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at * http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ * * Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis, * WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License * for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the * License. * * The Initial Developer of the Original Code is * [ insert your name / company etc. here eg. Jim Bob <[email protected]> ] * Portions created by the Initial Developer are Copyright (C) 2010 the * Initial Developer. All Rights Reserved. * * Contributor(s): Jim Bob <[email protected]> * Ted <[email protected]> * * Alternatively, the contents of this file may be used under the terms of * either the GNU General Public License Version 3 or later (the "GPLv3+"), or * the GNU Lesser General Public License Version 3 or later (the "LGPLv3+"), * in which case the provisions of the GPLv3+ or the LGPLv3+ are applicable * instead of those above. */ with (obviously) the name of the developer(s) being you. This header boilerplate is also available as COPYING.NEWFILES at the root of the build repository. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/build/tree/COPYING.NEWFILES Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
