On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:33:08AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist <tlillqv...@novell.com> wrote: > Sure, although I think I would prefer to keep OSL_THIS_FUNC as "" > instead of "(unknown)" in the fallback case.
OK, I just changed that and pushed it.
> So, you think the i#114290 argument that neither __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
> nor __func__ can be used because neither is a string literal and thus
> can't be compile-time concatenated with other string literals is
> bogus?
Yes, to my understanding.
> As such, it is true of course that they can't be used like that. But
> is the proper solution then just to not try to use OSL_THIS_FUNC in
> that way? Instead just pass it as a separate argument to printf (yeah,
> my C background shows through) or whatever?
I think, so. At least my use-case is like this:
OSL_TRACE("%s: unhandled segment '%x' in the path", OSL_THIS_FUNC, nSeg);
pgppjBFQvIrgz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
