On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:02:18AM +0000, Wols Lists wrote: > On 26/11/10 09:05, David Tardon wrote: > > I think that's not possible, because some of the filters (like > > WordprocessorML) use XSLT 2.0, which is not supported by libxslt (wasn't > > supported the last time I looked, at least). So either we throw > > out (or rewrite to XSLT 1.0) all XSLT 2.0 filters and declare that we > > only support XSLT 1.0 or we're stuck with saxon (and java). > > > Just throwing an idea out ... > > There's a lexer/parser project called Antlr that creates either Java or > C++ back ends. They may (or may not) already have an XSLT 2 parser etc. > > Is that worth investigating? If they've got it, it'll give us a tree > "for free" that we'll then have to analyse ourselves. >
Not at all. XSLT _is_ XML, therefore a parser is relatively trivial thing. What we need is XSLT 2.0 processor... D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
