Hi Jesse
I was talking about cppcheck bugtracker. There has been a fix for the
tracker #2235, this one has been corrected yesterday.
About false positives, i've created 3 trackers on cppcheck for the
moment. 2 have been fixed : #2235 i talked about and #2210 which has
been corrected by the cppcheck guys the 18/11. It seems like the other
one (#2217) has been corrected with other fixes since they didn't
reproduce it.
Julien.
Le 27/11/2010 23:02, some...@boldandbusted.com a écrit :
Hi Julien,
It is the "git" version of cppchcek, which I checkout every few days via
Portage. If you find false positives, you should let the cppcheck folks
know, and they'll remove it or otherwise correct it (or tell you that it
isn't a false positive ;) ).
Which "tracker" are you referencing? cppcheck's bugtracker or LO's? I'll
bump cppcheck today.
Cheers,
Jesse Adelman
Bold and Busted LLC
http://www.boldandbusted.com/
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:44 +0100, "Julien Nabet"<serval2...@yahoo.fr>
wrote:
Hello,
libreoffice.boldandbusted.com is a great idea, but what's the version
cppcheck used for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com ?
I ask this because cppcheck has sometimes false positives. For example,
lately i had opened a tracker (#2235: false Resource leak) and today
it's corrected.
It could be useful to know the date of the last update at the beginning
of the report.
Julien.
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
