On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:50:54PM +0100, Theo van Klaveren wrote: > Hello again, > > More unit test hacking. Only the ones that work are enabled.
Pushed, thanks! > Some questions that are coming up: > > - Some unit tests contain .xsce files that seem to be used to tell told the > old unit testing framework that the test is expected to segfault. This does > not seem to work with cppunittester? No, it doesn't. > - The math test fails in a way that is unexpected. The test checks that > double -> string -> double conversion works, and expects 1.#INF to result in > 1.#INF. The API docs agree, but the result is INF. This was probably broken by commit 9111657228393eb0cf0db493202abda300754f68 . I am inclined to accept the new behaviour and fix the docs and test (it seems to be a real corner case anyway), but maybe others have another opinion? D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
