On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote: > > > I'd also like to hear from some of our new developers that liked that > page - again, on the dev list. >
The easy hack page has hugely grown since I started. I guess that is a good thing, but in my opinion it's current form is not very practical nor inviting. I think that grouping easy-hack by 'nature' and then by difficulty do make sense. Difficulty is a very subjective measure, and something that is a 'easy gui hack' for someone may be a daunting task for someone else... when I was parsing this list I would first look at the title, then the skill required and _then_ the degree of difficulty announced - mostly to verify my first impression based on the previous 2 items. So, I do like the 'nature' oriented classification proposed, but maybe we could keep a one line overview of each task with a link for a dedicated page per task That way, a given task can be expended with as much information as needed without flooding the main page, including volunteer's progress report, declaration of intent and/or questions/answer section to clarify the task if need be. That way the main page still give a global overview of all easy-hack, but become much more readable... If the task are limited, on the main page to a one-liner, then the ToC doesn't have to be 3 pages long.... Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
