Am Sun, 1 May 2011 19:04:29 +0200 schrieb Andras Timar <tima...@gmail.com>:
> 2011/5/1 Andreas Radke <a.ra...@arcor.de>: > > It turns out no installation set at is created. Shouldn't it be put > > under > > instsetoo_native/unxlng*.pro/LibreOffice/installed/install/en-US/? > > No. You can run 'make dev-install' and have a symlinked installation > under $SRC_ROOT/install. Would you like to build packages instead? > Then you need --enable-epm and --with-epm=internal configure switches. > > Best regards, > Andras Thanks. Now I'm a step further. --enable-epm --with-epm=internal --with-package-format="native" This creates the installation sets. Also some fat download tarballs that I don't want. I guess this is what I want to install into our distribution package: ls -1 instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/LibreOffice/native/install/LibO_3.4.0beta3_Linux_x86-64_install_en-US/linux-2.6-x86_64/buildroot/opt/libreoffice/ CREDITS.odt LICENSE LICENSE.odt THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html basis-link basis3.4 program readmes share ure Can I prevent the creation of all the spec files and RPMS directories(no rpms being created)? I also get install sets in SDK, helppack and lang directory. Can I use them to build splitted packages? I guess you could save me a lot of work if you could fix the make $DESTDIR install step for me to get proper desktop integration. This has worked well until 3.3 releases. -Andy _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
