Hello, Following http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=a3ad01dc1e07da21182077bd899094fd73f57714, should it worth it to replace rtl_math_log1p/rtl_math_expm1 and related by boost::math::log1p/expm1 ? Or should we let the code as it is right now?
Since we already use Boost, I thought it could be interesting to use it even more, waiting by a even more C++11 compatibility (since this standard includes these 2 functions). Julien -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Should-we-use-boost-math-log1p-expm1-instead-of-rtl-math-log1p-expm1-tp4122334.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
