On 27/09/14 16:05, Zolnai Tamás wrote: > 2014-09-27 15:23 GMT+02:00 Miklos Vajna <vmik...@collabora.co.uk > <mailto:vmik...@collabora.co.uk>>: > > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 08:26:38AM +0200, Zolnai Tamás > <zolnaitamas2...@gmail.com <mailto:zolnaitamas2...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > So the only question is: > > Is it possible to replace the 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 linux packages with new > ones > > which are compiled with newer compilers? (expecting this is the problem) > > To fix the bug mentioned above. > > Isn't it possible to stick to boost::shared_ptr on -4-3, given that's > what other code does? > > > It's the collada2gltf code which uses std::shared_ptr at many places so > it would be much work to replace all of them with boost::shared_ptr, but > actually can be done if necessary. I just thought packages are created > with newer compilers, since they generate more better output (in theory). > Other thing is that I need to know whether this is the problem indeed. > So can I know what compilers are used for packages? Are they support > std::shared_ptr?
for LO 4.3 and earlier releases the RHEL5 gcc is used, i don't remember if it is gcc 4.1 or 4.4; we're only switching to a C++11 compiler for LO 4.4. actually most users will use the distro provided LO packages anyway and those don't suffer from our ancient upstream RHEL5 baseline. anyway, std::shared_ptr and boost::shared_ptr should be mostly the same, so "find ... | xargs sed -i ..." should be able to fix things up quite quickly to get a patch for the 4.3 branch. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice