On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:23 PM, BRM <bm_witn...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Just saying, there's more than one way to skin the cat (as the old saying > goes), > and there are multiple reason for choosing difference licensing methods, > many of which are very valid reasons - not all of which lead to GPL/LGPL. > To be clear I'm not saying that IBM reason for acting the way they are is not 'valid'. I'm saying that this is not 'valid' for me and _my_ reasons to participate, and, I suppose/hope(*), for most people that chose to participate in LibreOffice.
Norbert (*) Actually it is a bit more than wishful thinking. There has been significant evidences of numerous people indicating this (LGPL/no CLA) was indeed a motivating factor in their decision to join LibreOffice. and clearly that was also in the mind of the core group that started it too. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice