Hi, Rene Engelhard schrieb am 12.10.2014, 19:40 +0200: >On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Sebastian Humenda wrote: >> >It's supposed to pick it up automatically. >> > >> >> get debugging information if Libreoffice didn't pick up the extension for >> >> some >> >> reason? >> > >> >What does unopkg list --bundled (or validate --bundled) say. Does it appear >> $ unopkg list --bundled >> All deployed bundled extensions: >> >> <none> > >And validate --bundled? >If also not, it probably isn't seen at all... No, nothing.
>> Searching the web, I was not able to find information about which files are
>> relevant for this recognition process at all, only about how to invoke unopkg
>> with an OXT extension.
>
>Yeah, because this is supposed to be only used for "bundled" extensions.
Hence the word :).
>Does it have a proper description.xml? (And or META-INF/manifest.xml)?
>But when that isn't present a unopkg add .oxt shouldn't have worked either.
>Does that work?
It turns out that it doesn't.
$ unopg add -v *.oxt
ERROR: unsatisfied dependencies
Cause: (com.sun.star.deployment.DependencyException) { { Message =
"unsatisfied dependencies", Context = (com.sun.star.uno.XInterface) @91ec368 },
UnsatisfiedDependencies = ([]com.sun.star.xml.dom.XElement) { @91f7c8c } }
unopkg failed.
I've attached the description.xml, which you probably already have seen. Is it
because it depends on OO instead of LO?
Thanks
Sebastian
--
Web: http://www.crustulus.de | Blog:
http://www.crustulus.de/cgi-bin/blog.cgi?de-0
Freies Latein-Deutsch-Wörterbuch: http://www.crustulus.de/freedict.de.html
FreeDict: Free multilingual dictionary databases - http://www.freedict.org
description.xml
Description: XML document
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
