[ Sorry, replied off-list unintentionally. ] On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 04:10:37AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote: > I have reverted the gbuildization of gnumake4 in writerfilter and kept > "our" gbuildization. Still I think, we(**) should take a very close look > at that, as it seems to be doing some things quite right. I got the > gnumake4 gbuildization working, but I did not resync that state with the > latest changes in writerfilter. I created two temporary tags in filters: > - > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/tag/?id=feature/gnumake4_writerfilter_base > - > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/tag/?id=feature/gnumake4_writerfilter_head > > which are the working gnumake4 gbuildization state (head) and "our" > master state it was based on (base). That diff (in writerfilter only) is > pushed as a featurebranch: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/filters/commit/?h=feature/gnumake4_writerfilter > > which we can merge to master, if we choose to. Otherwise, we should > delete those.
Hi Bjoern, As we discussed on IRC in the long term it's a good idea to do what is in gnumake4 (merge the various small libs to a single writerfilter lib); but probably it makes more sense to do it once rtftok is not under heavy development. Of course if you / David want to do it right now I can live with that as well. Thanks.
pgprfgSkkKkzS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
