Hi Norbert, *, On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier > <lohmaier+libreoff...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> if it's already an alias for ccache, it won't be prefixed with an >> additional "ccace" > [...] > I'm not sure I'm following: are you talking of the case where someone, > on MacOS, has set-up ccache to masquerade as the compiler ?
I was using your words.. I'm talking about having setup ccache using symlinks. gcc → ccache g++ → ccache gcc-4.0.1 → ccache [...] And having those in a PATH that comes before actual compiler. It just doesn't make much sense to do magic with CC (i.e check whether it is ccache driven or not) and then later set CC to a completely different compiler. This is the part that is/was MacOS specific. You changed the order of the blocks, so thanks for that :-) ciao Christian _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
