On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci<gio...@svario.it>  
wrote:
I was wondering why the git tags are named `3.3.4.2` for 3.3.4-rc2
instead of the more natural `3.3.4-rc2` or the more common `v3.3.4-rc2`.
I am used to see 3.3.4.2 as the second bugfix release for 3.3.4, or, in
more mathematical terms, 3.3.4.2>  3.3.4 = 3.3.4.0. I hope 3.5-rc1 will
not be tagged as 3.5.1.

Is this behaviour a leftover of the SVN workflow? Could it be changed?

The problem is that when 3.4.x.y is tagged in git, nobody knows if it
will be the last RC or not. The final 3.4.x release is always the same
as the last RC, and there is only one 3.4.x.y tag for them.

Sorry, but I do not understand. What I'd do to release `3.4.1-rc2` is

1. tag current commit with `v3.4.1-rc2`,
2. ask for review,
3. if no problem is found, tag same commit with `v3.4.1`.

In case changes are needed:

3b. make change and tag the current commit with `v3.4.1-rc2`,
4. ask for another review,
4. tag same commit with `v3.4.1`.

Also in this case you have only one `3.4.X-rcY` tag for each `3.4.X`.

There must be something that I miss...

--
Gioele Barabucci <gio...@svario.it>

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to