On Wednesday, July 29, 2015 03:27:07 PM Eike Rathke wrote: > On Wednesday, 2015-07-29 22:45:18 +1200, Ryan McCoskrie wrote: > > (I'm having trouble with logerrit) > > That is why? We much prefer patches on gerrit, it eases review and > handling a lot. Using git review might also be an option for you. If for > some reason you *have* to use mail attachments, please use git > format-patch to generate the patch to be attached, which preserves > author and date and commit message, or even use the git send-email > command. >
I use gerrit last year successfully but at the moment it's rejecting my public key. I'm working on that though. > [Various technical notes] Thanks for the feed back. Hopefully my next contribution won't be such a mess. > Last but not least: > > Apparently we don't have your license statement on file, could you > please send us a blanket statement that you contribute all your past and > future patches under the MPLv2 and LGPLv3+ licenses? Best on the dev > mailing list libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org so we can link to it from > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers > > Something like this does nicely: > > All of my past & future contributions to LibreOffice may be > licensed under the MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license. > > Best use Subject: <your full name> license statement > I've already done that. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014-September/063297.html -- Ryan McCoskrie North Canterbury, New Zealand _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
