On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 17:09 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:53:59PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > Maybe due to some overzealous introduction of such helper > > implementations into the UDK. Sure, it eases development of > > applications, but at the costs we're facing now. > > The more helper we give to extensions, the less bugs they will have > and the more they will conform to interfaces we want them to conform > to. Looks like it can be worth the cost.
No, that's a wrong way to put it. The whole purpose of having common interfaces is to give implementation a freedom to implement as long as it conforms to the agreed-upon interfaces. Exposing the *implementation* of the interface to the extensions basically throws away that freedom, and we are paying for that now. So, no, it's definitely NOT worth the cost. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc <kohei.yosh...@suse.com> _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
