On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Ashod Nakashian <[email protected]> wrote: > OSL provides atomic helpers (osl_atomic_xxx) in the form of a GNU builtin > (where available) or a platform-specific implementation. > > Any reason for not using modern std::atomic (besides possible lack of > volunteers) ? > > > As a transitional phase, we can maintain the same interface but with > std:atomic as the implementation. > > Thoughts?
osl atomic are c interface, used in c-source... Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
