On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:38 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: >> I attach an updated cleanup.pl - that leaves the dummy rules, but >> removes duplicates in them > > Hmm, these dependencies and the pseudo-rules are initially spit out by > gcc's -MP so... > a) I'd have expected gcc to list each dependency only once in the first > place per .c/.cxx file anyway. > b) And then I'd have expected it to then only emit one dummy rule per > dependency for those. > > Looking at > workdir/unxlngx6/Dep/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/excel/xepage.d I see > that for path/to/CxxObject/sc/source/filter/excel/xepage.o there is > already core/sc/inc/scdllapi.h listed twice as a dependency for > sc/source/filter/excel/xepage.o and correspondingly two pseudo rules for > scdllapi.h > > Each pseudo-rule I *assume* is spat out by gcc on a one-to-one basis for > each dependency. So I wonder why gcc for e.g. xepage lists scdllapi.h > twice ?
could that be a case of #include "scdllapi.h" and #include <scdllapi.h> ? Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
