On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Michael Stahl <m...@openoffice.org> wrote: > On 07.09.2011 21:15, Peter Foley wrote: >> >> This is my first attempt at converting a module to gbuild so I'd >> appreciate it if someone knowlegeable about gbuild could take a look. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peter > > hi Peter, > > looks good, didn't know we have such a simple module :)
I wonder would that work dep wise to just have a packaging step ? > > only thing missing is that you should add the module to the top-level > Module_ooo.mk. and also tell the slideshow module to depend on it (right now it is done via build.lst... but Mesa can be integrated to tail_build, as it fulfill the requirement to do so) which might be a problem since I don't know that we have an api to declare pure include-packaging mode dep... the closest thing we have is gb_LinkTarget_add_api, but it is an overkill here as it try to add stuff in $INCLUDE... > > actually it seems somebody renamed it to RepositoryModule_ooo.mk. yep, because there was a clash with Module_tail_build.mk (which needed to be at the root) and the fact the gmake search for anything Module_* , so it was accidentally picking up Module_ooo.mk. Hence the rename. > ok, fits in better with the other RepositoryFoo.mk stuff. > but why not just RepositoryModule.mk? Some hope/anticipation that there may be more than one product sharing the same spaces ? not sure... Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice