On 13.09.2011 11:09, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 09/13/2011 01:00 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Michael Stahl<m...@openoffice.org> wrote: >>> On 12.09.2011 23:26, Peter Foley wrote: >>>> --- a/MathMLDTD/prj/build.lst >>>> +++ b/MathMLDTD/prj/build.lst >>>> @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@ >>>> -md MathMLDTD : solenv NULL >>>> -md MathMLDTD usr1 >>>> - all md_mkout NULL >>>> -md MathMLDTD\prj get >>>> - all md_prj NULL >>>> +md MathMLDTD : NULL >>> >>> you remove the dependency on solenv; it seems that currently we don't >>> have any module (except solenv of course, and "testautomation" which >>> doesn't do anything) that does not directly or indirectly depend on >>> solenv; i wonder why that is? is there perhaps some reason that modules >>> must depend on solenv? >> >> isn't that for the basic setup of solver ? (mkdir od bin inc etc..) >> but I believe Deliver.mk do the mkdir by precaution anyways.. so that >> should no have any impact here.. > > But that might explain the strange tinderbox failure at > <b>, > a missing 350minor.mk early one, where xml2cmp is one of the first three > modules being built (in parallel). > > -Stephan
thanks for reminding me, 3X0minor.mk was the thing that i only vaguely remembered. apparently it's still necessary in converted modules because we start gmake indirectly via dmake. guess somebody should put back the solenv deps :) _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice