On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:57:25PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > >yeah, I mentioned the le/be variant to be 'complete', I will certainly > >concede that it would likely be overkill. > >still having sal_utf16. sal_utf32 and even sal_utf8 would not hurt, > >especailly comapred to sal_Int32, sal_Unicode, sal_Char respectively > > Instead of introducing yet more typedefs, we'll more and more move to C++11 > char16_t, char32_t (which already started, now that sal_Unicode is a typedef > for char16_t, for non-WNT LIBO_INTERNAL).
That would be my preference as well, so what about replacing internal uses of sal_Unicode with char16_t? Regards, Khaled _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
