Hi Peter, Michael, all, On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 11:12:38 +0100 Michael Meeks <michael.me...@novell.com> wrote:
> Clearly there is then no prohibition on using ant, or > external / java packages that require it - but Peter's patches seem > to convert two of the five modules using ant to (cleaner) gnu make > files in the process and leave only: beanshell scripting and xmerge > requiring ant. > > Seems like progress to me, I'd love to see that included. I would have to agree. The patches look pretty clean(*) and look way better than the original codegenerated ant build.xmls. I also agree that we should stick with ant for _external_ projects that use it as their buildsystem (and not plug in our own build system like had been done with dmake at a few places), but for the modules in question now gbuildifying them seems to be a good thing. So: no objections -- actually quite fine work there, Peter! Best, Bjoern (*) But as with all things build system you need tinderboxes to be sure. -- https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
