> On 12 Mar 2016, at 09:52, Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 2:10 AM, jan iversen > <j...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Just tried the new chocolate setup with lode, works very nicely. GOOD WORK. >> >> It would be even nice if we got it integrated into the first lode install >> script, or at least the script check for the prerequsites. > > lode is meant to be run as a non-admin, on purpose so that the cygwin > installed is owned by the normal user.. which save the back and forth > to install new packages or edit /etc or usr/ > and in general it is a good thing to build with a regular user (just > like on linux you should not build as root) > > chocolate, and the stuff it install need to be as 'admin' > so that still would require two step... > Still that can make things much nicer.. since lode could provide a > chocolate wrapper that the user be instructed to run as admin.... > Interesting, when I read the instructions, I read that install_cygwin.ps1 is run as admin, and ./setup as a normal user (due to the fat warning before running ./setup).
My thinking was to have the chocolate steps in install_cygwin.ps1 with our "defaults" and command line options to overwrite them. rgds jan i. > Norbert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
