On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 13:30 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:49 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > I *suppose* it would be madness to have dependency rules on the > > makefiles themselves that anything created by the makefiles is out of > > date when the makefiles change ? > > :-) sounds reasonable enough. Of course its more than the makefile, the > environment matters quite a bit too I imagine. We fixed scp2's macro.pl > to detect and re-build for environment / scpdefs changes, but there is a > lot more to do I guess.
I suppose we'd always be stuck with on incremental builds with e.g. header removals where the header remains in the solver, and/or a .so to .a changes, where the .so remain behind. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
