At 2:58am -0400 Wed, 05 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 10/04/2011 11:01 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
Here is a second patch that compiles, /should/ respond to what you just
confirmed was the original intent, but is untested. (It was a random
drive by patching.) Specifically, I suppose it's obvious that this now
changes the semantics of it actually used to do. If you know how to test
it ...
Yes, that's how I would have done it, too. Pushed now, thanks again.
(I assume you already stated somewhere what license your
contributions are under, even though that's not explicitly listed at
<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers>.)
Heh, yeah, awhile ago. Had a whole discussion with the Meeks. :-)
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-October/001178.html
In short: LGPLv3.
I should update that list, but I figure I'm yet a minor contributor, etc.
Cheers,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
