Stephan Bergmann píše v St 26. 10. 2011 v 13:39 +0200: > On 10/03/2011 03:11 PM, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Stephan Bergmann píše v Po 19. 09. 2011 v 11:02 +0200: > >> Petr, > >> > >> following is an excerpt from #libreoffice-dev this morning: > >> > >>> <sberg> caolan, btw valgrind, is there any good reason for > >>> (a)>valgrind.log in soffice script (for child output, > >>> VALGRIND_OPTS=--log-file=...%p... would help, no?); > > > > The option was primary added for normal users, so that they could > > provide debug information easily. This is why I have chosen the > > single output file "valgrind.log". > > > > Other solution would be to pack the generated logs into a tarball. > > > > To be honest, I do not have much experiences with valgrind. I used my > > experience with strace where I prefer single output file. It is > > easier for searching. :-) > > Is this an often-used feature, normal users producing a valgrind.log? > And could those users be educated to use ">valgrind.log 2>&1" instead?
I open for any changes but I would like to keep it as easy a possible. > I would really like to get rid of the code in the soffice start script, > as it makes more elaborate uses of valgrind painful I wonder if we could somehow improve the current state for your needed? What is your preferred way of use? What exactly do you hate and/or miss? > (sure, you can always remove the code locally, but I tend to forget it, and > if you need > to do it repeatedly its a PITA, anyway). Sure, this is annoying. We need to improve it, so that you need not do it. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice