On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:53 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > So, from a practical standpoint, failing smoketest on failed SAL_WARNs > would be right. On the other hand, there might be SAL_WARNs that > legitimately fire during smoketest (a trivial example would be if we > purposefully tested illegal input during smoketest),
Given the pain of getting the smoketest warning free, We could policy that smoketest is warning free, while unit tests are ok to have warnings, they should be encouraged to explore the edge-space where warnings can be expected. Only thing left unresolved from my perspective is whether warnings on windows works. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
