Hi, From Björn's message: > Hmm, in the future, maybe just adding a "[very old comment]" to it could be > helpful. But no need to retroactively seek though old translations IMHO.
Okay, won't do this then for Philipp's translations. Anyway, what constitutes a [very old comment], would that be anything before 2001? From Philipp's message: > But then, what constitutes an old comment? Very often I found that the > "JP with a date" comments were obviously added _after_ the original > comment. That's interesting. How do you determine that..? By seeing that there is a "conversation" in the comments (original comment > second comment about a change in behaviour)? Or because pointers to bugs are usually added later on when the product is already released? Or by some other means? > Maybe a "FIXME: Old comment" would be a good heads-up? I'm almost sure, not all our old code is bad, so there is probably a need to fix /all/ of it. > Also, the comments are literally littered with "!!!!!ACHTUNG: !!!!!" > and double question marks. What should we make of that? I'm not a fan of excessive punctuation, so I would just convert this to "Attention!"/"Caution!"/"Warning!", whatever seems appropriate. Astron. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
