When I said I'll solve it locally, I mean I'll solve it on my machine only.
2017-11-12 18:29 GMT+01:00 Bjoern Michaelsen < [email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 09:40:41PM +0100, Zolnai Tamás wrote: > > I meant a configure option what you can add to autogen.input and so you > > don't need to type make <module>.build or make build-nocheck, but use the > > simple "make" for building and make check for run a build with tests, but > > never mind I solve it locally. > > Please dont. There have been endless bikeshed on which target do what and > everytime you change something there will be another (unproductive) one. > And it > will take at least 6 month until all the documentation and wikipages on the > build are again reflecting the status quo. > > Furthermore, this isnt about configuration, but about build targets -- so > it > doesnt belong to autoconf (which already does way to many things anyway). > > As others have pointed out, the targets you are looking for are available. > If > you dont like how they are named, please just create yourself some > function or > alias in your local ~/.bashrc, but do not force this on the rest of the > world[1]. > > Best, > > Bjoern > > [1] The _only_ reason to change the meaning of common targets at all is to > move them > towards the most widely accepted expectations. And that would be to > resemble: > http://airs.com/ian/configure/ > as closly as possible. OTOH, better fitting someones personal taste is > NOT a > good reason for change. > And even in the case of moving towards what autotools would do, the > main > task is hunting down and updating all preexisting LibreOffice build > documentation in wikis, askbot, repos and articles and adapt that. > Without the latter, such a change would STILL be a net negative. >
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
