On 09/04/18 17:06, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 21:37 +0000, Luke Benes wrote:
After commit https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id
=975884fbbc3f80a634258ee562037688a42027a9

ofz#7110 ensure join is called on std::exceptions as well as
uno::Exception

Both gcc and clang are failing on my 32 bit Fedora box.

huh, I was unaware of that. Seems that tinderbox isn't the mailing
kind. Works under x86_64 (obviously, passed ci) so I don't quite know
what's going on there. For the moment does simply removing that test
case make it pass again (https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/52643/) ?

caolanm->sberg: that should have worked, right ? I see gcc3_linux_x86-
64/uno2cpp.cxx has explicit catch (std::exception) from
0166b35fc660911c02d56852fca79f89e7cede5c #i114635# handle non-UNO
exceptions in C++ UNO bridge, for unxlngx6, rest to follow.

Is it the case that the x86 bridge never got extended the same way
after all ?

Calling cppu::getCaughtException on non-UNO exceptions (and relying on the C++ UNO bridge called internally by that to translate those to RuntimeException) is a bit of a stretch. And it turns out <https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114635> "C++ UNO bridge should convert non-UNO exceptions into RuntimeException" had indeed never been implemented at least for bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel. But the current state is a convincing argument to port that trivial fix also to the bridge variants that are still missing it. I'll take care.

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Reply via email to