On 07/02/18 14:42, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
Am 07.02.2018 um 14:21 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
On 07.02.2018 11:46, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 09:57:46AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 07.02.2018 09:33, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
commit bf23fe3a4a3eebe3d08fa26341a486b83d80c1c7
Author: Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]>
Date: Wed Feb 7 09:11:35 2018 +0100
Fix CustomTarget_postprocess/check_dynamic_objects for
--enable-qt5
The dependency of Library_vcl on qt5 libraries (via
vcl/qt5/Qt5Font.cxx) is
there ever since b66a7cbd8491fe436126e11975c360f47ae346ed "QT5
first stab on
implementing CommonSalLayout", but no idea whether that is by
design or is a
hack that should eventually be cleaned up.
Any thoughts on the above? It might e.g. by undesirable for distros
that do
--enable-qt5 but split libvclplug_qt5lo.so into a Qt5-dependent
package of
its own (and don't want the base vcl package to depend on Qt5).
Yes, I already "complained" about this, jmux had a look/wanted to have
a look. This is a blocker for me enabling qt5. I am so not making -core
depending on qt5.
So whoever will eventually fix that, please remember to revert the
relevant part of this bf23fe3a4a3eebe3d08fa26341a486b83d80c1c7, too.
There are two commits to fix this:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/47279/
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/47408/
So the submitted version of the latter of those two apparently brought
the requested revert to master.
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
