On 16/05/18 11:18, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> while std::lround returns long.
> For the latter, "[i]f the rounded value is outside the range of the
> return type, the numeric result is unspecified" (C11). So the proposed
> tests would not work (and should not really be of interest for us,
> anyway, as the FRound versions cause UB to begin with).
=) fair enough.
> For cases where the FRound version wouldn't have caused UB anyway
> because the value was outside the range of long, I /think/ using
> std::lround is a correct replacement.
Hopefully we'll get similar UB ;-) but sounds like you're pro the
change.
Further thoughts most welcome, but sounds positive.
Thanks !
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
