Hello, it is confusing, when the most stable version does not compile, as it happened to me, and when this is not going to change.
I suggest recomending only versions, which either compile, or in case they don’t compile, they are supposed to be publically tweaked to compile. Regards Дилян On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 12:03 +0000, Kaganski Mike wrote: > On 16.01.2019 14:49, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > > Hello, > > > > what I wanted to ask was, why does the LO-webpage recommend for enterprises > > end of life products. > > > > My understanding of the processes is, that there are usually a stable > > version, that is not end-of-live, and a most > > current version, at the same time. However there are gaps, when the > > webpage offers only one version, that is not end of > > life, without stating this clear. > > 6.0 *is* the stable version at the moment, that is rightfully > recommended now. EOL means only one thing: no more releases for this > branch are planned. This happens at the moment when the last release of > the branch comes out. The last release for 6.0 brought last portion of > the fixes; and at this moment, 6.0.7 is considered the most stable - and > for that reason, recommended; and at the same time, TDF won't release > any more patches to it - so it's EOLed. So do you suggest to only > recommend versions that don't have the last pack of fixes? > > -- > Best regards, > Mike Kaganski _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
